The examination process at the NCUA went on trial last week. Not before a court but before Congress, though it could end up in court, too. To claim NCUA is unbiased would be a farce. To say an examiner won’t retaliate if they’re made to look bad by a credit union availing itself of this process would be ludicrous. The NCUA tends to lean in favor of protecting the NCUSIF, which all federally insured credit unions want to remain strong, but it also can mean less flexibility in an activity that might pose a risk to the fund. Credit unions are in the business of mitigating risk, yet in some instances it seems the agency wants to eliminate it.**** Read More; The Examiner as the Examined: Editor's Column:
The National Credit Union Administration has finalized a rule to improve board and executive succession planning within the credit union industry. This strategic move aims to curb the trend of mergers driven by technological stagnation and poor succession strategies, ensuring more credit unions maintain their independence and enhance their technological capabilities. By Ken McCarthy, Manager of marketing communications at Tyfone Credit unions are merging out of existence because of an inability to invest in technology, the National Credit Union Administration Board wrote when introducing its now finalized rule on board succession planning. The regulator now requires credit unions to establish succession planning for critical positions in their organizations. But it’s likely to have even wider effects, such as preserving more independent charters and shaking up the perspectives of those on credit union boards. “Voluntary mergers can be used to create economies of scale to offer more or ...
Comments
Post a Comment
Please no profanity or political comments.