Skip to main content

Understanding Credit Union Salary Surveys

Guest post by Jack E. Clark, PhD, Clark & Chase Research, Inc.With executive compensation under scrutiny, salary surveys are increasingly important. If done correctly, surveys provide reasonable estimates of what you could expect if you had access to this data for every credit union. Surveys are far superior to decisions based on guesswork or anecdotal information picked up from some of your colleagues. However, not all surveys are the same and the user needs to know what to look for.

How representative is the sample?

A good survey should obtain a sample representative of the larger population. For example, were all credit unions in the population of interest approached or did they at least have an equal chance of being approached? Was there anything in the selection that may have excluded important groups or favored others? If so, how would that affect results?

Some factors cannot be controlled but can be taken into account when analyzing the results. For example, the smaller the credit union, the more likely it is to forego this type of survey. As a result, the total sample may be over-represented by larger credit unions. This can have a misleading impact on overall findings especially anything influenced by asset size. However, an adjustment can be made during analysis (weighting) that brings asset size back into proper proportion, allowing for a more realistic estimate.

Is the sample size adequate?

A larger sample lowers a survey’s margin of error and increases our level of confidence in the results. However, it is not enough to only pay attention to the overall survey’s sample size. Since decision-makers are mostly interested in the findings for credit unions similar to theirs, the results are broken down by various groups. And the sample size for each group is what really matters.

The problem occurs when findings are reported based on very small sample sizes. For example, findings based on a sample size of five have such a high margin of error that the results are unreliable and meaningless, even if they look official.

What minimum sample size is recommended? There is no single standard but most recommendations range between 30 and 100. A single standard is difficult because it is a matter of degree – we cannot say a sample size of 30 is clearly adequate but 29 is clearly inadequate. Decision-makers would be well-served to simply pay attention to sample size and adjust their level of caution based on that.

Percentile Ranges

Compensation is typically presented in percentiles. If compensation is $90,000 at the 25th percentile – it means 25% of those surveyed are compensated at or below $90,000. Percentiles can help you see the range of compensation paid by credit unions.

It is recommended the decision-maker initially focus on the compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles. Some compensation experts feel this inter-quartile range (IQR) provides a more meaningful measure.[1] We can see the reason for this in the following table from a recent survey.

Understanding Surveys Example Table

When we focus on the amounts at the 10th and 90th percentiles, there is overlap as you move from one asset group to the next. The compensation at the 90th percentile is often higher than the 10th percentile in the next larger asset group – seemingly contradicting the tendency for compensation to increase with asset size.

The 10th and 90th percentiles represent values at extremes of these ranges – sometimes referred to as outliers. When we focus on values between the 25th and 75th percentiles, there tends to be much less overlap.

Besides asset size, there are other reasons that may influence the compensation figures we see at the extremes of these ranges. Every credit union’s situation is unique. And even though you may initially focus attention on the IQR, your credit union’s situation may justify a figure above or even below that range. In short, the IQR is meant as a guideline but should not be seen as a constraint.

Comparing Results From Two or More Surveys

You can enhance your compensation strategy by reviewing the results of more than one salary survey, if they are conducted in a valid and reliable manner. However, you will want to consider if there are differences between them and how those differences may impact results.

For example, we conduct a survey of all Federal credit unions for NAFCU and Burns-Fazzi Brock. If another survey includes both state and Federal credit unions, you would want to consider if and how that difference affects comparability.

Perhaps most difficulties in comparing survey results are due to differences in how each survey groups the data. For example, your credit union has $200 million in total assets. One survey includes your credit union in an asset group of $100 million to $300 million and the other survey includes it in a group of $200 million to $400 million. Because asset size and compensation are strongly related, the compensation figures for these two asset ranges will be different, making the comparison more challenging.

The Methodology section for any survey report is worthwhile reading. It can provide you information to help you decide on the survey’s worth as well as its limitations. And if the information you are looking for is not provided, you may want to consider asking for it.

Opportunity Alert! Sign up to participate in the 2012 NAFCU & Burns-Fazzi, Brock Executive Compensation & Benefits Survey for Federal Credit Unions and get the results report FREE!

[1] Haley, R.M., Measures of Central Tendency, Location and Dispersion in Salary Survey Research, Compensation and Benefits Review, September/October, 2004, pp. 39-52.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Avoiding "I" in Marketing Presentations Matters

  Grant Sheehan, CCUE | CCUP | CEO NCOFCU  You know how things just stick with you? Well, many years ago, my marketing professor started off his class with the following, and it has never left me.  The Power of Perspective: Why Avoiding "I" in Marketing Presentations Matters In the world of marketing, effective communication is paramount. One valuable piece of advice that often comes from experienced instructors and industry veterans is the importance of avoiding the use of the word “I” in presentations and reports. At first glance, this may seem counterintuitive; after all, many individuals feel that personal anecdotes and experiences can enhance a message. However, upon deeper reflection, the reasoning behind this approach reveals itself as essential for achieving impactful communication. Building Objectivity When marketing professionals present their findings or insights, it’s important to establish credibility. Utilizing data, surveys, and feedback from cu...

Open Banking To Hit $94B By 2029—But U.S. Lags Amid Global Surge

NEW YORK—By 2029, open banking is projected to surge globally to a staggering $94.14 billion in value. Yet despite its rapid evolution and expanding global footprint, adoption remains uneven—hindered by inconsistent regulatory frameworks across countries. According to GlobalData, this disparity poses a key challenge for the sector’s success, with the U.S. notably trailing behind global peers in embracing open banking. The U.K. pioneered open banking and continues to be one of the leaders globally. The country has seen the number of users increasing, with there being 12.09 million active users of open banking in 2024 and 223.9 million payments made. This is an increase of 72% compared to the year before. “As open banking continues to flourish, it is positive to see that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) have outlined how open banking can expand further in the U.K., and also be used in variable recurring payments and e-commerce. With this move,...

Agencies Issue Exemption Order To Customer Identification Program (CIP) Requirements

WASHINGTON--The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency, and NCUA, with the concurrence of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, issued an order Friday granting an exemption from a requirement of the Customer Identification Program (CIP) Rule implementing Section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The CIP Rule requires a bank or credit union to obtain taxpayer identification number (TIN) information from its customer before opening an account, and the exemption permits a bank or credit union to use an alternative collection method to obtain TIN information from a third-party rather than from the customer, the agencies stated in a joint release. The order applies to accounts at all entities supervised by the agencies. "Since the CIP Rule was issued initially in 2003, there has been a significant evolution in the ways consumers access financial services, along with a rise in reported customer reluctance to provide their full TIN due, in part, to...

Letter to Federal Credit Unions (25-FCU-02) Federal Credit Union Post-Examination Survey

    Letter to Federal Credit Unions (25-FCU-02) Federal Credit Union Post-Examination Survey Dear Boards of Directors and Chief Executive Officers: The NCUA has been using a voluntary post-examination survey for examinations of federal credit unions since 2021. This feedback is very important and helps the NCUA evaluate our examination processes; credit unions have used the open-ended questions to submit numerous useful suggestions. To further improve the survey process, the NCUA has arranged to have the post-examination survey administered by an external vendor. The external vendor will begin administering the survey starti...

Sunday Reading - What is the Declaration of Independence?

What is the Declaration of Independence ? The Declaration of Independence is the founding document that formally announced the American colonies' break from British rule. It laid the philosophical and moral foundation for American democracy, asserting that individuals possess inherent rights and that governments must be accountable to the people ( read summary here ). Although Thomas Jefferson is often remembered as the sole author ( read initial draft ), extensive collaboration shaped the Declaration. Benjamin Franklin and John Adams made small but impactful revisions— including Franklin’s reported suggestion  to change “We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable” to “self-evident”—before submitting the draft to Congress. On July 4, 1776, the final text was adopted and sent to printer John Dunlap, who produced an estimated 200 broadsides that night—but that wasn’t the actual day of American independence . Congress had voted for independence two days earlier, ...