Skip to main content

10 reasons why good managers sometimes make bad decisions

MOOSINNING, Germany–There are 10 reasons why good managers sometimes make bad decisions, according to one analysis.

Not surprisingly, the report by GreatWorkLife.com notes, when an otherwise competent manager starts making bad decisions, it can impact their team and the broader organization.

Among those 10 reasons:

Inexperience in Life or Leadership


 “A young manager just starting on their career in management might simply not have enough business and life experience to make a high percentage of good decisions,” GreatWorkLife.com observed. “Often a mistake of young managers is to say ‘Yes’ to everything, which can lead to an over-burdening of the team. While saying ‘No’ to many requests may lead others to perceive the manager in a negative light. Always saying Yes without question and without prioritizing the requests can lead to overworking your team, forcing poor decision-making further down the line.”

Moreover, inexperience in leading people on a personal level can also lead to bad decisions. “A younger manager that manages more mature workers can run into conflict if they do not show the required levels of self-confidence to stick to their decisions and follow them through. If the young manager is not committed to their decisions, they cannot expect their older team members to follow through either.”
Personal Life Pressures

Although it is unprofessional to let your personal life interfere with your professional life, it happens all too often, observed GreatWorkLife.com. “Consider a manager that is going through a painful split with their partner, discovers that a team member has started dating another co-worker. The manager stages an intervention with the two employees and stresses that workplace romances are not acceptable in the company.”

Time Pressure 

The life of a manager is often one of being under constant time pressure. For example:

  • You need to deliver a sales number by the end of the month
  • You need to present your status report at the senior manager’s weekly team meeting
  • You need to stay late to complete your presentations for the next day
  • You need to interview ten candidates for an open position
  • You need to formulate a detailed business case for investment in a new product or service
“The role of a manager can be exciting and challenging, but the package comes with time pressure,” the report stated. “If your manager is overwhelmed, they may not be able to dedicate enough time to consider important decisions adequately.”

Stress & Overwork


Due to time pressure and overwhelming demands on the team, your manager may well be under stress, GreatWorkLife.com reminded.

“Often decisions made under the conditions of stress and overwork are not good decisions. Many companies now promote a work/life balance. But while they promote it, most management teams do not actually support it. You get promoted by delivering results, not having a good work/life balance. If you, as a manager, can achieve both, you will have a better decision-making track record.”

Senior Leadership Pressure

If you have not been a manager, you may not appreciate that managers are under constant pressure from above, the report pointed out.

“If you have a great manager, they will protect you from external pressures so that you can perform.”

According to GreatWorkLife.com, common senior leadership pressures that lead to poor decision making include:
  • Forcing continual cost reductions even though the business is growing
  • Enforcing a “Fire the underperforming employees” policy
  • Inflating targets to unachievable levels to force an over performance situation
  • Pushing a policy of continual workforce downsizing. Even though your company meets its revenue, sales, and profit targets, leadership is still reducing the workforce by 10% per year.
  • Constantly reorganizing the company between functional hierarchy (Sales, Product Development, Operations) or business unit hierarchy (Product A, Product B, Product C).
“Most senior leaders do not understand the company well enough to optimize the organizational structures, yet they will constantly reorganize to attempt to prove they are doing something of value,” the analysis stated. “These pressures exert a huge burden on managers, which can lead to poor decision-making.”

Pressure from Individual Team Members

“Some teams have larger-than-life characters that perform important roles and have undue influence within the team,” GreatWorkLife.com pointed out. “ This is a real-life example from my early career. I took a freelance I.T. contract with a large pharmaceutical company. I was 23 years old, and the contract was more money than I could have dreamed of as someone fairly fresh out of university. There was a guy in the team; let’s call him Dave. Dave was a tough lad, physically, mentally, and personally; he did not suffer fools gladly and was crushing if any “Newbie” made a mistake. Even his manager was scared of him. The team was effectively being run by Dave, and it did not help the manager that Dave was also one of the most talented IT guys in the company.

“This placed the manager in an awkward position of deference to Dave’s wishes. If you, as a manager, are in this position of managing a tyrant, you either need to befriend and coach them into better work practices or develop someone to take over their work and let them go.”

No Clear Personal Values

As a manager, you need to have a clearly defined set of personal values; these values will enable you to make better business and team decisions, the report stated, pointing to what it called the FATHER Principles:

Fairness:
The principle of fairness is core to the way we humans interact and expect to be treated. By default, we expect to be treated fairly and strive to treat others fairly. As a leader, you should always treat your team, tribe, or followers fairly.

Accountability: Being accountable for bad decisions or mistakes shows your moral fiber. We all make mistakes, but also many of us will not admit our mistakes and move on. Accepting accountability shows you are a strong, well-rounded leader with a character that people will respect and follow.

Trust: Great relationships and great teams are built on trust. Your team, your family, and your friendships rely on trust to grow and develop meaning. All high-performing teams, whether in the military, football teams, or teams within your company, will have a strong foundation when built on trust.

Honesty: Being able to discuss openly and honestly important issues with those around you is key to the integrity of our relationships. Honesty feeds into trust directly. If you cannot be honest with someone, it means you cannot trust them to hear the truth.

Equality: The principle of equality is core to our global human survival and happiness. There are so many inequities in the world, based largely on the fact that people love to discriminate against others for so many reasons.

Respect:
The meaning of respect is to show regard for the wishes, feelings, and rights of others. You may not agree with the feelings or wishes of other people, but you need to respect that they have those feelings. You need to be able to appreciate that someone is the way they are for a reason. A true understanding of humanity means you will learn to respect the differences in us all. You may not agree with those differences, but you need to ability to consider why those differences exist.

No Solid Decision-Making Process

To keep it simple, there are two major theories/considerations in ethics that are said to compete, duty and utilitarianism, according to GreatWorkLife.com.

“The duty-based approach establishes right or wrong based on a list of rules such as the biblical rule ‘Thou shalt not kill.’ If you break the rule, you are in breach. Most company codes of conduct are duty-based,” GreatWorkLife.com stated. “The utilitarian approach judges a decision to be right or wrong based on the consequences of ‘the greatest good or the least pain.’”

Ego & Power


The age-old phrase “power corrupts” is as true as it is timeless, GreatWorkLife.com stated.

“While a leader might not have a lot of influence in the world, they certainly wield power over their sub-ordinates. A manager without a solid foundation of meaningful values will start to make poor decisions when they feel they are in a position of power. When a manager exudes the aura of being able to walk on water, it will coincide with poor decision-making.”

Lack of Balance Between Emotion & Logic


“We, humans, are both logical and emotional animals,” the analysis observed. “Yet, in some areas of our life, we let emotion control our decision-making. For example, when it comes to the choice of partner or choices of friends, we are often, if not entirely, driven by emotion. A well-balanced manager should be able to make good logical choices that also sit well with them emotionally. Overly cold and calculating business decision making without consideration for the human aspects and impact of the decision will not be balanced. Moreover, an overly emotional decision that makes no logical sense is equally destructive.”

Why You Might Think A Management Decision Was Bad: Hindsight Bias


:As explained in scientific research into managerial decision making the hindsight bias,” GreatWorkLife.com explained. “This occurs when people look back on their own judgments and those of others. We typically are not very good at recalling or reconstructing the way an uncertain situation appeared to us before finding out the results of the decision. As Max Bazerman puts it: In general, individuals should be judged by the process and logic of their decisions, not just on their results. A decision-maker who makes a high-quality decision that does not work out should be rewarded, not punished. Why? Because results are affected by a variety of factors outside the direct control of the decision-maker. When the hindsight bias leads our knowledge of the result to color our evaluation of the decision maker’s logic, we will make poorer evaluations than we would otherwise.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hauptman Tells Congress CU Health is Strong; Responds to Questions from Committee

WASHINGTON — National Credit Union Administration Chairman Kyle Hauptman told members of the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday that the nation’s credit union system remains financially strong, while warning that rising delinquencies and consumer financial stress continue to warrant close monitoring. Hauptman also responded to a handful of questions from members of Congress, as well. Hauptman appeared as part of the regular hearings on Oversight of Prudential Regulators. Also appearing as witnesses were Michelle Bowman, vice chair for supervision with the Federal Reserve; Travis Hill, FDIC chairman, and Jonathan Gould, the acting Comptroller of the Currency. Kyle Hauptman In his prepared statement, Hauptman said federally insured credit unions remain well-capitalized and continue to meet members’ borrowing needs despite economic headwinds. He said the NCUA is focused on maintaining safety and soundness, protecting the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund and creating...

Reuters: Trump Regulators Launch Biggest Bank Oversight Overhaul Since 2008

Is NCUA next? WASHINGTON—Federal banking regulators under President Trump are undertaking what Reuters described as the most significant overhaul of bank supervision since the 2008 financial crisis, shifting examiner focus away from process and compliance issues and toward what agencies consider “material” financial risks. According to Reuters, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have directed examiners to concentrate on risks that pose direct threats to a bank’s safety and soundness, rather than on paperwork deficiencies, governance concerns or procedural issues that do not immediately affect financial stability. Reuters reported that regulators have also moved away from evaluating banks based on “reputational risk,” a supervisory concept long criticized by banks as overly subjective. The change follows complaints from President Trump and others that financial institutions have used reputational-risk considerations...

Sunday Reading - Changing the Map

  Changing the Map     Redistricting, explained Congressional redistricting is the process by which states redraw electoral district boundaries   that determine representation in the US House of Representatives. The Constitution, federal law, and court rulings require districts to have roughly equal populations, avoid discrimination against racial or language minorities, and, in most states, be geographically contiguous. For most of American history, redistricting has followed a predictable cycle, occurring every 10 years after the census.   Gerrymandering is the deliberate manipulation of district boundaries to advantage one political party. Common tactics  by both major American political parties include packing opposition voters i...

Cheer Up and Change: "Wait and see is not a plan."

I posted this a year ago and thought I would bring it back to see if any of his predictions came true. Take a look and tell us what you think. Grant Sheehan CEO Cheer Up and Change: The Demographic Mandate At a conference I recently attended Monday morning started off with a great session by demographer and futurist Ken Gronbach, who laid out his predictions on where we’re going and what we can expect as demographics change. I was pleasantly surprised that the future isn’t sounding as bleak as the news might have you believe. Gronbach offered lots of predictions for where our society and our world is headed. His predictions were given with a purpose: To help associations build their vision and plan for the future. As Gronbach stressed,  "Wait and see is not a plan." I’ve decided to arrange this recap into a list of my takeaways rather than a narrative recap. I hope you get as much out of this information as I did! Things to Expect: Big Changes in Retail : Gronbach ...

Fire Family Foundation Establishes Erksine Fire: Rebuilding Lives and Community Fund

Fund Will Assist Fire Victims and Firefighters in Kern County July    8, Los Angeles, CA:   Responding to the emergency of deadly wildfires that are currently blazing through communities in Kern County, Fire Family Foundation, the charitable hand of Firefighters First Credit Union, has created the Erskine Fire: Rebuilding Lives and Community Fund. California’s largest wildfire so far this year, the Erskine fire erupted Thursday afternoon and continues to burn; two people have died, thousands have left their homes, 200 homes were destroyed with many others severely damaged. Four firefighters who were working on the blaze learned the sad news that their own homes were completely destroyed by the fire. The Erskine Fire Fund will dedicate 100% of the funds raised to be distributed to firefighters and fire victims; funds will be used for short-term assistance to pay expenses for essential and immediate needs from food to mortgages/rent "Our firefighters are battli...

Proposed FOM changes would streamline ability to reach underserved

February 16, 2023 The NCUA Board proposed chartering and field-of-membership changes and issued its final cyber incident reporting rule at its Thursday meeting. The board also heard a quarterly update on the share insurance fund, which noted an increase in the fund's equity ratio to 1.30%." The proposal would amend the chartering and FOM rules through nine changes to enhance consumer access to financial services, especially in low- and moderate-income communities while reducing duplicative or unnecessary paperwork and administrative requirements. “Getting credit union services to more communities across the country is important to CUNA, state leagues and the credit unions we serve, and making that easier to achieve has a big impact on access,” said CUNA Deputy Chief Advocacy Officer Jason Stverak. “While we need to review the proposal in detail, we thank the NCUA board for working to streamline the ability of credit un...

Letter to Credit Unions Says NCUA Exam Modernization Now Underway

ALEXANDRIA, Va.—NCUA has sent a Letter to Credit Unions ( 21-CU-08 ) detailing the agency's transition to modernized systems. The agency said it will begin this transition in August. NCUA’s efforts will include the implementation of emerging and secure technology that supports the NCUA’s examination, data collection, field of membership, and reporting efforts. “These new applications will streamline processes and procedures and provide significant benefits to credit union users,” NCUA said. Key areas affected: NCUA Connect Admin Portal Consumer Access Process and Reporting Information System (CAPRIS) 1 Modern Examination & Risk Identification Tool (MERIT) Data Exchange Application (DEXA) Training Available To prepare credit unions for the transition to these new systems, NCUA said it will provide credit union user training through various avenues, including: A self-paced training curriculum covering MERIT functionality available through the NCUA’s Learning Management Service An...

IRS Reporting Requirement Has Turned Into Uphill Battle for CUs

  It’s in. It’s out. It’s in again. On Thursday, NAFCU, CUNA and more than 100 associations sent a letter to all members of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate asking them to reject a proposed IRS reporting requirement that credit union trades have been pushing back against since July . The proposed IRS reporting requirement would require financial institutions, including credit unions, to report the inflows and outflows of personal and business accounts, as well as transfers between accounts of the same owner, if it is more than $600 per year. The proposal found new life inside the House version of the budget reconciliation bill after it was rejected in the version approved by the House Ways and Means Committee last month. On Tuesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the IRS reporting requirement would be included in the House version of the bill. CUNA, NAFCU and other organizations voiced their objections to the proposal in a joint letter. While the l...

Biggest Social Security Changes for 2025

  Chris Gash Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Monthly payments are going up, and drop-in service at SSA offices is largely going away The  cost-of-living adjustment  (COLA) may be the most widely anticipated way Social Security changes from year to year, but it’s far from the only one. Inflation, wage trends and new policies directly affect not just the more than 68 million people receiving Social Security benefits but also the estimated 184 million workers (and future beneficiaries) paying into the system.  Here are seven important ways Social Security will be different in 2025. 1. Cost-of-living adjustment Inflation continued to cool this year , resulting in a  2.5 percent COLA  for 2025 for people receiving Social Security payments, down from  3.2 percent in 2024 . The estimated average retirement benefit will increase by $49 a month, from $1,927 to $1,976, starting in January, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA). It’s the lowest COLA i...

NAFCU - Vehicle Sales Decline During 2017

ARLINGTON, Va.—Vehicle sales in 2017 totaled 17.23 million units, non-seasonally adjusted, marking the first year-over-year sales decline since 2009. Total vehicle sales increased in December to 17.85 million seasonally adjusted, annualized units but were down 1.7% from a year ago. "Looking ahead, sales are expected to trend down further in 2018 as pent-up demand from earlier years diminishes," observed NAFCU Research Assistant Yun Cohen in a Macro Data Flash report. "In addition, banks are tightening standards on auto loans according to a recent survey by the Federal Reserve, which could lead to credit constraints. Despite the slowdown, vehicle sales are expected to remain strong in light of a strong labor market and growing economy." According to data by Autodata Corp., car sales decreased from 6.3 million to 6.1 million annualized units during the month. However, sales of light trucks increased from 11.2 million to 11.8 million annualized units, Cohen no...