Skip to main content

What to Know About EV Lending

 By Ray Birch

WEST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP, N.J.—There are a couple of important facts credit unions must keep in mind as they increasingly make loans for electric vehicles (EVs).

The first is that while EVs are perceived to be more economical than internal combustion engine (ICE)-powered vehicles, one new report suggests that while electric vehicles are cheaper to operate, the overall savings may not be as significant as many people think.

Moreover, as EVs become the dominant form of transportation, prices for charging—even at home—will begin to rise just like gas prices, one automotive industry expert is predicting.

Feature EV Vs. ICE

Sumit Chauhan, co- founder and COO at Cerebrum X, which provides AI-driven automotive data services and a management platform, said that kind of conventional wisdom-challenging pieces of information must be considered by auto lenders both for the sake of their own portfolios as well as the sake of members’ household budgets.

“It's not yet cheaper to charge many electric cars than it would be to fuel their gas-powered counterparts,” said Chauhan, citing a study from Anderson Economic Group. “The cost of filling up at a gas station versus plugging in—and whether those two match up—largely depends on the vehicle segment and price.”

What Report Found

The report calculated driving costs for vehicles driving 12,000 “purposeful” miles per year in the Midwest and Michigan. The study took into consideration residential electricity prices, commercial charging prices, tax rates levied on fuel and EVs, fuel economy for popular models in each vehicle segment, and the allowance for travel to commercial charging stations.

“The analysis considered four categories of real-world costs for both ICE and EVs, including energy, taxes, pump or charger, and deadhead miles,” the study states.

The study found trucks cost about the same to fuel and charge, while entry and midlevel cars and SUVs cost more to charge at home and in public than they do to fuel at a gas station.

“Luxury cars and SUVs fall somewhere in the middle,” he said. “Of course, gas prices can fluctuate and electricity costs vary widely by region depending on how it is produced.”

Chauhan, citing Kelley Blue Book data, said cost parity between electric vehicles and internal-combustion engine cars is largely lacking—EVs are generally more expensive—with an average transaction price of $53,438 in June versus $48,808 for ICE vehicles.

Additional Findings

The Anderson Economic Group further found the following:

  • Entry-priced cars and crossovers. “In the entry-priced segment, gas-powered cars were the most economical to fuel at around $9.78 per 100 purposeful miles. That’s significantly more affordable than an entry-priced EV charged mostly at home ($12.55), and it’s a dramatic savings over an EV charged mostly at commercial charging stations ($15.97),” the report states.
  • Mid-priced cars and crossovers. “ICE vehicles were also more affordable to fuel in this segment, at approximately $11.08 per 100 miles. This cost is lower than that for primarily home EV charging ($12.62) and for mostly commercial EV charging ($16.10),” according to the report.
  • Luxury-priced cars and crossovers. “In the luxury segment, electric vehicles charged mostly at home were the most economical. High-end EV drivers paid around $13.50 per 100 miles, as opposed to the $17.56 it would have cost to fuel a comparable ICE car. Luxury EV drivers charging mostly commercially, however, paid slightly more than they would have in an ICE vehicle ($17.81),” the report states.
  • Pickup trucks. “At around $17.10 per 100 miles, diesel-powered trucks were less expensive to fuel than their gas or electric counterparts. Gasoline-powered pickups cost about $17.58 to fuel, while EV trucks charged mostly at home cost $17.72. Drivers of electric pickups who needed to charge commercially most of the time found themselves paying about $26.38—exceeding their diesel counterparts by about $9,” according to the report.
Sumit Chauhan

Sumit Chauhan

‘Not As Much as People Think’

“So, the savings are not as massively different as people think,” Chauhan said.

When it comes to the two forms of EV charging—the public chargers and the at-home chargers, Chauhan told CUToday.info, “The issues are slightly different between each of them. The issue with public charging is how do I know which is the one that is closest to me while I'm driving and I'm running out of charge, and how much would it cost me to go and charge there,” he said.

And, of course, different types of chargers re-charge vehicles faster than others.

Charge-Buddy?

Chauhan said he expects that in the near future there will be apps, like Gas Buddy, that will be available for EV charging stations.

“You will see which are the lowest cost and help you optimize the number of hours that you spend charging at a public charging station,” he said, with the objective being to save people money.

Meanwhile, when it comes to home chargers, where most of the charging takes place, Chauhan said some challenges exist.

“Let's say you work nine to six. You come back at six, plug in your car in your garage. What is happening today is the car starts charging immediately after you plug it in,” he explained. “But your car is plugged in the whole night. Why do you need to charge it at 6 p.m. when probably the electric rates are at their highest. The ideal thing to do is, if you know that you're not going to drive till 6 a.m., charge between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. when rates are the lowest.”

‘Jacking Up Rates’

Such tools are already available, noted Chauhan, who suggested that’s important as the price for electricity is only going to increase.

“Right now, the government is giving a lot of thought towards electrification of cars. But, as the number of electric vehicles increases and the amount of electricity being consumed markedly increases, they will start jacking up the rates.”

Then there is another factor Chauhan believes will help drive up electricity costs, and that is that EVs do not generate the kinds of fuel taxes used to pay for road maintenance.  

“Each time you fill your tank there is a small percentage of that price that goes towards the road tax. Right now, because the government is focusing a lot on electrification, people who are charging their electric cars are not paying for the road tax,” Chauhan said.

At some point that tax will also be passed along at charging stations and at homes, Chauhan noted.

“The whole intention is to move people to electrification, because it's cleaner and supposedly better than what we have today. But the cost side of this will catch up with consumers,” Chauhan said.

‘Even Worse’

Another concern for EV owners today is the possibility of non-standard charging stations not working the same for all of EV batteries. Chauhan said that may lead to a public charger damaging EV batteries.

“Even worse, it could possibly impact the car’s electrical system,” he said.

Chauhan anticipates standards will eventually be developed for charging stations, but for now, it’s a issue that goes beyond just a concern for EV owners—it’s also potentially problematic dor lenders for which the vehicles are collateral.

“Lenders would be wise to give their new EV borrowers a booklet on how to best use public charging stations and how to take advantage of the lowest electric rates when they are at home,” Chauhan advised. “That will not only help to protect the borrower, but the lender, as well.”

Chauhan further advised lenders to really understand the warranty contracts on battery cells for each EV they finance.

“The major repair concern with an EV is the battery cells,” reminded Chauhan. “Whoever the maker of the cell is, the lender needs to review those warranties carefully. As I said before, what happens if an EV charging station, or even owner error, damages the battery.”

Varied Costs

Just as the Anderson Economic Group study pointed out, operating costs to run an ICE vehicle 100 miles depend a great deal on the make and model of the car, which also holds true with an EV.

Data show that across the entire Tesla range, for example, it could cost between $2.90 and $4.50 to drive 100 miles. Entry-priced EVs charged at stations cost $15.97 per 100 miles, reports have stated. Also, a June 2021, the Department of Energy conducted a study to compare the maintenance costs of EVs and ICE vehicles. Overall, the DOE found that an EV costs 6.1 cents per mile driven, whereas an ICE vehicle costs 10.1 cents per mile driven.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sunday Reading - Year of the Fire Horse

        Year of the Fire Horse   Lunar New Year celebrations kick off  tomorrow, ushering in the Year of the Fire Horse in the Chinese zodiac. The 15-day festivities, observed by billions worldwide, start with the new moon and end with the Lantern Festival. China anticipates a record 9.5 billion trips during the 40-day travel rush around the holiday, the world’s largest annual human migration. The horse is the seventh animal in the 12-year zodiac cycle and symbolizes energy, independence, and ambition. Those born in horse years are seen as dynamic, courageous, and charismatic. Many see the Year of the Fire Horse as a time to tak...

The NCOFCU Podcast: Clear Insight. No Jargon.

Every week, we cover the latest trends and developments within the credit union industry. At NCOFCU, we are dedicated to providing you with insightful discussions that cut through the clutter. Our podcast features expert opinions, in-depth analyses, and an exploration of the challenges and opportunities that credit unions, directors, and staff face today. Join us as we navigate the evolving industry and empower associations with the knowledge they need to thrive. https://ceohp.podbean.com/ ================================================= Remember, you're not alone with  NCOFCU.org Join/Upgrade Check out some of NCOFCU's additional features: First Responder Credit Union Academy Financial Literacy Podcasts YouTube Mini's Blog Job Board

Eight Credit Unions Pay $42 Million in Special Dividends to 1.1 Million Members

  By  Jim DuPlessis   | January 05, 2026 at 04:00 PM So far this season, CU Times has tallied 19 credit unions, which have announced $160.3 million in special dividends for members.       Eight more credit unions have reported special dividends, paying their 1.1 million members $42.1 million in December and January. The bulk of the dividends came from Police and Fire Federal Credit Union of Philadelphia and Eastman Credit Union of Kingsport, Tenn., which each announced $16 million in rewards approved by their boards. The late January payout from Eastman ($9.7 billion, 356,492 members) will bring its total special dividends to $225 million since 1998. A news release from the credit union said “the Extraordinary Dividend is never guaranteed, but the strong financial performance of ECU in 2025 enabled the Board of Directors to approve this year’s $16 million payout.” Eastman’s $16 million payout represents about $47 per member and 19 basis points of its averag...

Sunday Reading - Budweiser 101

Draft Horses   Budweiser 101 Perhaps best known for its Super Bowl Clydesdale ads, Budweiser   is among the world’s most popular beer brands. It was among the first beers to achieve national distribution in the late 19th century, thanks to its revolutionary refrigeration and pasteurization techniques, setting the stage for the modern US beer industry.   Founded in the 1850s as the “Bavarian Brewery,” the company was acquired in 1860 by Eberhard Anheuser. He sold half of it to his son-in-law,  Adolphus Busch ,   in 1869, forming the partnership that would become Anheuser-Busch in St. Louis, Missouri.   In the 1870s, Carl Conrad , a St. Louis distributor, traveled through a Bohemian town called “Budweis” in German and drank a pale lager. Upon returning home, he worked with Anheuser-Busch to brew its own light lager, marketing it under the ...

Next Gen of Payments Could Leave ACH System Behind, Bank CEO Cautions

NEW YORK–The next generation of payments could leave the Automated Clearing House (ACH) system behind as stablecoins and tokenized deposits move into the banking core, according to one bank CEO. Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long said during a discussion with TheStreet Roundtable host Scott Melker that the “tokenized dollars are going to be big. Yes, there’s a distinction between tokenized bank deposits and stablecoins. Yes, right now, all the activity is in stablecoins, but we’re going to link the two in a safe and sound way.” During the discussion, Long cited Citi’s upgraded forecast for the sector, which now projects between $3 trillion and $4 trillion in stablecoins outstanding by 2030, according to Yahoo Finance, which noted Long believes even that range is far too conservative. “Those numbers are still too low,” she said. “I think they’re way too low.” According to Long, the innovation lies in embedding blockchain technology directly into the banking infrastructure rath...

Potential Changes to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Written by Steve Van Beek NAFCU On the Tuesday after Memorial Day, I thought it was fitting to discuss some movement on Capitol Hill regarding proposed extensions to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). As reported in the NAFCU Today , the House passed an Amendment offered by Elijah Cummings (D-MD) to the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (which also passed the House in recent weeks).  The Amendment would provide additional protections to servicemembers.  The additional protections include: Extending post-service mortgage protection from nine months to 12 months; Extending certain SCRA protections to surviving spouses; Extending SCRA protections to all totally disabled veterans leaving the military; Requiring each financial institution - including credit unions - to designate a SCRA compliance officer; and Requiring institutions over $10 billion in assets to maintain a toll-free number for SCRA issues. A similar bill was introduced in the Senate. ...

Why First Responder Credit Unions Are Built to Adopt Blockchain Faster

  For years, blockchain in financial services lived mostly in the world of experimentation—proofs of concept, pilot programs, and innovation labs that rarely touched day-to-day operations. That era is ending. Today, blockchain adoption is moving from experimentation to scale. Across payments, capital markets, and banking infrastructure, financial institutions are beginning to operate on new rails—powered by tokenized money, programmable assets, and always-on settlement models. For credit unions serving first responders, this shift presents not just a technology opportunity, but a strategic one. Blockchain Is Becoming Core Infrastructure The most important change isn’t the technology itself—it’s how it’s being used. Blockchain is no longer about testing what might work. It’s increasingly being deployed as infrastructure to solve long-standing problems in financial services, including slow settlement, trapped liquidity, manual reconciliation, and limited operating hours. Cr...

No New Pennies, New Rules: Treasury Sets Guidance For Cash Transactions

WASHINGTON—For credit unions and their members, the penny’s long goodbye is no longer theoretical—it’s operational. Just before Christmas the U.S. Treasury quietly released a detailed set of  Penny Production Cessation FAQs,  confirming that the federal government has stopped manufacturing new pennies and laying out how businesses, financial institutions, and consumers should prepare as the coin gradually slips out of everyday use. The move reflects a basic math problem: It now costs 3.69 cents to produce a single penny, nearly triple its cost a decade ago. Treasury estimates halting production will save taxpayers $56 million annually, while acknowledging that the coin’s purchasing power—and relevance—has steadily eroded in an economy dominated by electronic payments. What Changes At The Register—And What Doesn’t Despite the halt in production, pennies are not being eliminated. Roughly 114 billion pennies remain in circulation, and the Federal Reserve will continue recirculati...

7 Things to Do (And Avoid) with SMS/Text in Credit Union Marketing

By not using SMS text messaging for marketing, you are missing a channel with a 98% open rate and a rapid response rate. Consumers love the convenience and are open to receiving personalized and relevant texts from their bank and credit union. Naturally there are some caveats to be aware of. Here are seven pointers. Are you content to have your customers take 90 minutes to respond back to a communication you’ve sent, or would 90 seconds be better? That’s the difference in average response times between email and SMS text. Then there is the open rate: SMS texts have high open rates — up to 98%, according to Gartner and 82% by another source. The average open rate of email is around 20%. If you send an email with a link to a survey to find out what a consumer thinks about the virtual meeting with a lending officer they just had, it may linger in the consumers’ inbox for days, at which point the experience is no longer top-of-mind or the consumer decides to simply delete the ...