Skip to main content

NCUA Has Concerns Over Overdraft Concentration Risk

By Ray Birch

ALEXANDRIA, Va.—Not only will credit union overdraft programs be getting scrutiny this year from NCUA, but the agency will also be expanding the number of credit unions it will be watching, according to Todd Harper, who said the issue is about more than just fairness for consumers but also about concentration risk.

In an exclusive interview with CUToday.info, NCUA’s chairman said the agency in 2024 will be looking at overdraft programs of all credit unions above $100 million in assets. In 2023, the threshold was $500 million.

Harper is cautioning that credit unions that rely too heavily on overdraft income will need to change their business model.

As CUToday.info previously reported, Harper recently spoke to the Brookings Institution, where in addition to a broad update on CU- and agency-related issues, he also indicated the agency will be giving greater scrutiny to overdraft programs and that examiners this year will continue an expanded review of credit union overdraft programs, including website advertising, balance calculation methods, and settlement processes.

thumbnail_Feature Harper

Changing Marketplace

“The marketplace on overdraft fees is changing,” Harper told CUToday.info. “We're seeing numerous institutions lower their overdraft fees or are dropping them all together. We’re also seeing not only are they dropping price, but some of them are getting rid of NSF fees.”

Harper pointed to a recent CFPB study that shows two out of three banks above $10 billion in assets have eliminated their NFS fees, whereas four out of five credit unions still have them.

“We have to be thinking about this and be competitive,” Harper said. “Credit unions have a statutory obligation and mission to meet the credit and savings needs of members, especially those of modest means. We know that overdrafting often falls on people of modest means and lower income. Again, the marketplace is changing. Credit unions have to be adjusting their business models to meet that change.”

‘Going Deeper’

Harper emphasized the agency will be “expanding what we started last year,” when NCUA began looking at OD programs of CUs above $500 million in assets.

“This year we're looking at credit unions above $100 million—as well as those credit unions above $500 million that we may not have gotten to last year,” he said. “We're taking a look at exactly what are their practices. What are their website advertising practices? What is their business on balance calculation methods, and their settlement processes? Going deeper, we're looking for things like authorizing positive, settling negative, where the consumer believes they have a positive balance and they go forward and make the transaction and then get a fee charged.”

As CUToday.info has reported, numerous credit unions have been hit with lawsuits over the so-called practice of authorize positive, settle negative, with a panel of attorneys at CUNA’s GAC in 2023 warning credit unions to be especially careful.

Harper Todd

Todd Harper

Looking for Patterns & Practices

In addition, the chairman said the federal regulator will be watching for incidents where members are paying multiple overdraft fees in quick succession, which can “can drive somebody into a hole.”

“We're also looking for those patterns or practices that could be problematic or unfair to consumers, likely to cause substantial injury,” said Harper, who has made consumer compliance a priority, even as CU trade groups have pushed back. “Those are the main issues that we're looking at.”

What’s Fair?

One much-debated issue is just what is “fair pricing” to cover the costs a credit union incurs from an overdraft. Asked about that issue, Harper said the answer will be market-driven and also being addressed by the CFPB.

As reported here, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra recently called overdraft fees a “junk fee harvesting machine.” In its newest proposal, the Bureau has proposed a range of pricing benchmarks of $3-$14 per overdraft.

“The CFPB has proposed what these fees should be. But what I'm focused on is whether there is concentration risk,” Harper said. “Is the credit union overly reliant on overdraft fees. If so, then that credit union has more than just a consumer compliance problem, it has a safety and soundness problem.”

Harper urged credit unions to closely monitor the overdraft market.

“Credit unions need to be thinking, they need to be 10 steps ahead of where the market is and be adjusting their balance sheets and their business plans accordingly, knowing that these (prices) are going to continue to drop,” he said.

A Business Decision

Asked if the agency is concerned all of the pressure on overdraft programs will lead many credit unions to exit this market, as some analysts have predicted, Harper said that is “a business decision for the credit union to make. There ought to be many different available means for low-cost low dollar loans. For example, the Payday Alternative Loan product. I know of some credit unions that got rid of their overdraft programs and replaced it with a low-dollar revolving line of credit. I want to make sure that credit is available. I want to make sure that it's safe, it's fair and it's affordable.”

Will the CFPB’s proposal, which applies to Fis above $10 billion in assets, trickle down to the smaller credit unions through competitive pressures? Harper said he expects the market may dictate such a scenario.

Harper did not offer an opinion on whether NCUA believes many credit unions have become too reliant on overdraft revenue. Instead, he stated the answer will be “determined on a credit union by credit union basis. A good balance sheet is made up of a wide variety of sources of revenue. I do think that markets are changing. Credit unions need to be adjusting their business models.

From the Have Not’s to the Have’s

“We know that one-third of households earning $65,000 or less are charged these fees, yet it's only one in 10 households above $175,000 that are charged these fees,” concluded Harper. “The credit union system should not be taking from those who don't have and giving to those who have. We need to make sure that there's balance in the credit union system.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Both Sides of The Desk!

With over 50 years of experience in the credit union sector, I have had the privilege of observing and participating in its evolution from various vantage points. My journey has taken me from serving as a dedicated volunteer holding critical leadership roles, including serving on the supervisory committee, as director, and as board chairman, culminating in my tenure as CEO for 12 years and now founder and President/CEO of the National Council of Firefighter Credit Unions . This extensive background has enabled me to " Sit On Both Sides Of The Desk ," blending operational expertise with strategic oversight. In this blog post, I want to share how this dual perspective has enriched my understanding of credit union dynamics and fostered more effective governance. By leveraging the insights gained from years spent navigating both the intricacies of daily operations and the broader strategic objectives, I have witnessed firsthand the transformative power of collaboration, communi...

Fresh First Quarter 5300 Data Is Live. How Do You Compare?

  CALLAHAN RESOURCE Fresh First Quarter Data Is Live. How Do You Compare? The latest NCUA call report data is out, and while you’ve been focused on day-to-day priorities, market shifts might be affecting how you reach your goals. That’s why credit union leaders are already benchmarking performance to spot trends and inform their next moves. Ready to join them? Schedule a free performance analysis session with Callahan to gain a clear view of where you stand. Schedule Now

Fed Chair To Senate: Tariffs May Trigger Persistent Inflation, Slowing Rate Cut Plans

WASHINGTON— Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told a U.S. Senate panel Wednesday that while the Trump administration’s tariffs may lead to a one-time spike in prices, the risk of more persistent inflation is significant enough for the central bank to proceed cautiously with any further interest rate cuts, Reuters reported. Although economic theory suggests tariffs are typically a temporary shock to prices, “that is not a law of nature,” Powell said, explaining that the Fed wants greater clarity on the scope of the tariffs and their impact on pricing and inflation expectations before making additional moves on borrowing costs, Reuters said. "If it comes in quickly and it is over and done then yes, very likely it is a one-time thing," that won't lead to more persistent inflation, Powell said. But "it is a risk we feel. As the people who are supposed to keep stable prices, we need to manage that risk. That's all we're doing," through holding rates steady ...

The Case for Sharing a CEO Between Credit Unions

  Embracing Collaboration: The Case for Sharing a CEO Between Credit Unions In recent years, credit unions have faced numerous challenges, from regulatory pressures to evolving member expectations. As many seasoned leaders retire, smaller credit unions often find themselves at a turning point. In this landscape, one innovative solution is gaining traction: sharing a CEO between two credit unions. This approach not only addresses financial constraints but also fosters collaboration and enhances service delivery. The Rationale Behind Sharing a CEO 1. Financial Sustainability One of the most pressing concerns for small credit unions is maintaining financial health amid rising operational costs. A shared CEO model alleviates the financial burden of hiring and compensating a full-time executive. By splitting salary and benefits, both credit unions can allocate resources more effectively, allowing for investment in member services, technology, and community initiatives. ...

Why Avoiding "I" in Marketing Presentations Matters

  Grant Sheehan, CCUE | CCUP | CEO NCOFCU  You know how things just stick with you? Well, many years ago, my marketing professor started off his class with the following, and it has never left me.  The Power of Perspective: Why Avoiding "I" in Marketing Presentations Matters In the world of marketing, effective communication is paramount. One valuable piece of advice that often comes from experienced instructors and industry veterans is the importance of avoiding the use of the word “I” in presentations and reports. At first glance, this may seem counterintuitive; after all, many individuals feel that personal anecdotes and experiences can enhance a message. However, upon deeper reflection, the reasoning behind this approach reveals itself as essential for achieving impactful communication. Building Objectivity When marketing professionals present their findings or insights, it’s important to establish credibility. Utilizing data, surveys, and feedback from cu...