Skip to main content

NCUA Has Concerns Over Overdraft Concentration Risk

By Ray Birch

ALEXANDRIA, Va.—Not only will credit union overdraft programs be getting scrutiny this year from NCUA, but the agency will also be expanding the number of credit unions it will be watching, according to Todd Harper, who said the issue is about more than just fairness for consumers but also about concentration risk.

In an exclusive interview with CUToday.info, NCUA’s chairman said the agency in 2024 will be looking at overdraft programs of all credit unions above $100 million in assets. In 2023, the threshold was $500 million.

Harper is cautioning that credit unions that rely too heavily on overdraft income will need to change their business model.

As CUToday.info previously reported, Harper recently spoke to the Brookings Institution, where in addition to a broad update on CU- and agency-related issues, he also indicated the agency will be giving greater scrutiny to overdraft programs and that examiners this year will continue an expanded review of credit union overdraft programs, including website advertising, balance calculation methods, and settlement processes.

thumbnail_Feature Harper

Changing Marketplace

“The marketplace on overdraft fees is changing,” Harper told CUToday.info. “We're seeing numerous institutions lower their overdraft fees or are dropping them all together. We’re also seeing not only are they dropping price, but some of them are getting rid of NSF fees.”

Harper pointed to a recent CFPB study that shows two out of three banks above $10 billion in assets have eliminated their NFS fees, whereas four out of five credit unions still have them.

“We have to be thinking about this and be competitive,” Harper said. “Credit unions have a statutory obligation and mission to meet the credit and savings needs of members, especially those of modest means. We know that overdrafting often falls on people of modest means and lower income. Again, the marketplace is changing. Credit unions have to be adjusting their business models to meet that change.”

‘Going Deeper’

Harper emphasized the agency will be “expanding what we started last year,” when NCUA began looking at OD programs of CUs above $500 million in assets.

“This year we're looking at credit unions above $100 million—as well as those credit unions above $500 million that we may not have gotten to last year,” he said. “We're taking a look at exactly what are their practices. What are their website advertising practices? What is their business on balance calculation methods, and their settlement processes? Going deeper, we're looking for things like authorizing positive, settling negative, where the consumer believes they have a positive balance and they go forward and make the transaction and then get a fee charged.”

As CUToday.info has reported, numerous credit unions have been hit with lawsuits over the so-called practice of authorize positive, settle negative, with a panel of attorneys at CUNA’s GAC in 2023 warning credit unions to be especially careful.

Harper Todd

Todd Harper

Looking for Patterns & Practices

In addition, the chairman said the federal regulator will be watching for incidents where members are paying multiple overdraft fees in quick succession, which can “can drive somebody into a hole.”

“We're also looking for those patterns or practices that could be problematic or unfair to consumers, likely to cause substantial injury,” said Harper, who has made consumer compliance a priority, even as CU trade groups have pushed back. “Those are the main issues that we're looking at.”

What’s Fair?

One much-debated issue is just what is “fair pricing” to cover the costs a credit union incurs from an overdraft. Asked about that issue, Harper said the answer will be market-driven and also being addressed by the CFPB.

As reported here, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra recently called overdraft fees a “junk fee harvesting machine.” In its newest proposal, the Bureau has proposed a range of pricing benchmarks of $3-$14 per overdraft.

“The CFPB has proposed what these fees should be. But what I'm focused on is whether there is concentration risk,” Harper said. “Is the credit union overly reliant on overdraft fees. If so, then that credit union has more than just a consumer compliance problem, it has a safety and soundness problem.”

Harper urged credit unions to closely monitor the overdraft market.

“Credit unions need to be thinking, they need to be 10 steps ahead of where the market is and be adjusting their balance sheets and their business plans accordingly, knowing that these (prices) are going to continue to drop,” he said.

A Business Decision

Asked if the agency is concerned all of the pressure on overdraft programs will lead many credit unions to exit this market, as some analysts have predicted, Harper said that is “a business decision for the credit union to make. There ought to be many different available means for low-cost low dollar loans. For example, the Payday Alternative Loan product. I know of some credit unions that got rid of their overdraft programs and replaced it with a low-dollar revolving line of credit. I want to make sure that credit is available. I want to make sure that it's safe, it's fair and it's affordable.”

Will the CFPB’s proposal, which applies to Fis above $10 billion in assets, trickle down to the smaller credit unions through competitive pressures? Harper said he expects the market may dictate such a scenario.

Harper did not offer an opinion on whether NCUA believes many credit unions have become too reliant on overdraft revenue. Instead, he stated the answer will be “determined on a credit union by credit union basis. A good balance sheet is made up of a wide variety of sources of revenue. I do think that markets are changing. Credit unions need to be adjusting their business models.

From the Have Not’s to the Have’s

“We know that one-third of households earning $65,000 or less are charged these fees, yet it's only one in 10 households above $175,000 that are charged these fees,” concluded Harper. “The credit union system should not be taking from those who don't have and giving to those who have. We need to make sure that there's balance in the credit union system.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The First Social Network

Credit Unions: The Original Social Network Long before likes, follows, shares, and friend requests, people built networks another way: They showed up for each other. That’s essentially how credit unions began. Not as financial corporations, but as human networks built on trust, shared experiences, and mutual support. In many ways, credit unions were the first true social networks. Before Technology Connected People, Communities Did Today’s social platforms promise connection. They help people share ideas, ask questions, organize communities, and support causes. But more than a century ago, credit unions were already doing something remarkably similar — only in person and with real financial stakes involved. Teachers gathered with teachers. Factory workers organized with coworkers. Church members helped fellow congregants. Military personnel supported military families. Firefighters stood beside fellow first responders. Police officers supported the communities and d...

Honor Our Heroes This Memorial Day

  First Responder Credit Union Academy   Attendee Registration Tucson, AZ 2026 ...

Vizo Financial and TCT Risk Solutions Announce Strategic Partnership

                  Vizo Financial and TCT Risk Solutions Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance Risk Management Offerings Greensboro, N.C. (May 6, 2026) – Vizo Financial and TCT Risk Solutions are pleased to announce a new strategic partnership designed to expand and strengthen risk management solutions for credit unions. This partnership brings together Vizo Financial’s trusted role as a cooperative provider of back-office support, consulting and education with TCT Risk Solutions’ specialized risk management tools, which include credit migration, loan and deposit pricing, CECL, and asset liability modeling. Through this collaboration, Vizo Financial will offer TCT's signature software and advisory capabilities, equipping credit unions with actionable insights to better understand risk, optimize financial performance and make more informed strategic decisions. The partnership aims to help credit unions move beyond reactive risk m...

Meeting Portals - Why Choose MyBoardPacket.com

MyBoardPacket is known as the simplest, most secure, and affordable online board packet solution. A low monthly fee, with no setup fee, no annual contracts, free customer support and unlimited users! We use MyBoardPacket.com here at NCOFCU, and we love it! Exclusive discount of 25% for NCOFCU Members! Additional discounts are granted for small asset size credit unions! Why choose MyBoardPacket over other meeting portals? The Facts: MyBoardPacket was the first secure board portal on the market, starting in 2001. So easy to use that no training is required! However, for your peace of mind, you have unlimited support and training with your very own Trainer, which any Admin can schedule whenever needed. Unlimited users , committees, and meetings from anywhere! On MyBoardPacket everyone is on the same page . Month-to-month subscription – our customers are with MyBoardPacket because they love it, not because they are locked into a lengthy contract! MyBoar...

Syracuse Fire Department Credit Union

  p This just in - shared branching is HERE! What's shared branching? If you aren't nearby, you can visit a shared branching location throughout the country to perform a number of actions such as deposits, withdrawals, and loan payments. Traveling and need funds? Need a check while you're out of town? Try shared branching! More information and locations available on our website! https://www.syrfirecu.com/shared-branching/

FFIEC Proposes Biggest CAMELS Overhaul In 30 Years, Citing Need For Greater Transparency

  W ASHINGTON—The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council is seeking public comment on a proposed overhaul of the CAMELS supervisory ratings framework, marking what regulators said would be the first comprehensive revision of the bank and credit union examination system in approximately 30 years. Michelle Bowman The proposal would revise the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System—better known as CAMELS—to place greater emphasis on material financial risk and improve the transparency and predictability of supervisory ratings. Regulators said the framework would continue to evaluate institutions on capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk, while modifying certain composite and component rating definitions and evaluation factors. In announcing the proposal, FFIEC Chair and Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said the revised framework is intended to create “a decisive shift toward transpare...

Just Out! - NCUA Stablecoin Plan Opens Door To Credit Union-Backed Digital Dollar Issuers

ALEXANDRIA, Va.—A sweeping new NCUA proposal to implement the GENIUS Act could open the door for credit union-backed stablecoin issuance, but only through separately licensed subsidiaries operating under an extensive new federal regulatory framework that limits risks to the Share Insurance Fund. The 269-page supplemental proposed rule issued Friday lays out how “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” affiliated with federally insured credit unions would be supervised, examined and regulated by the NCUA, while also establishing rules covering reserves, liquidity, custody, operational risk, cybersecurity, anti-money laundering compliance and disclosure standards. The proposal supplements an earlier February 2026 proposal by the agency focused primarily on licensing and investments in stablecoin issuers. Federally insured credit unions themselves would still be prohibited from directly issuing payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act. Instead, issuance would have to occur through a separa...

Former JPMorgan Banker: Exploiting Consumers Is 'The Purpose Of The Banking ...

Former JPMorgan Banker: Exploiting Consumers Is 'The Purpose Of The Banking <b>...</b> : In October, 650000 Americans joined credit unions , which, as Mooney noted, are “supposed to be run in the interests of all members.” 40000 more joined them on Bank Transfer Day earlier this month. Wall Street, meanwhile, continues to ignore America's ... See all stories on this topic » ThinkProgress

The Rebounding Relevance of Adjustable-Rate Mortgages = By Kevin Hearden & Steve Rick

  This traditional mortgage lending product could help CUs attract high-contributing members and boost much-needed interest income. By Kevin Hearden & Steve Rick | August 19, 2022 at 03:33 PM Today, nearly three-quarters (72%) of credit unions’ total revenues come from interest income. So, when interest earnings as a percent of assets dropped almost 30% in April of this year, more than one alarm bell sounded within the movement. Credit union leaders across the country are rightly concerned about the sustainability of mortgage lending within what is already a highly competitive environment. In fact, lending executives participating in a May 2022 MGIC survey ranked the expected difficulty of 2022 at an eight out of 10. And while shiny startup strategies for boosting interest income make the headlines, it may be the resurgence of a traditional mortgage lending product that makes the difference. Borrowers Give ARMs a Fresh Look We’re talking, of c...

Visa, Mastercard Revisions Will Cost Merchants more Than $475 Million Annually, Economist Says

 NEW YORK—The two biggest U.S. card networks are preparing revisions to their interchange schedules that at least one research firm says will cost U.S. merchants an estimated $475 million in additional transaction fees. Though Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. have historically revised their rate schedules each April and October, “this April is particularly significant,” Callum Godwin, the Atlanta-based chief economist for CMSPI, a United Kingdom-based research firm, told Digital Transactions. The firm’s estimates indicate the changes in Visa’s rates will add up to a net $145 million in additional cost to acquirers. For Mastercard, the impact will net out to $330 million. The networks do not collect interchange. Merchant processors pay in...