Skip to main content

If NY's AG Is Right, Then We Are All Doing Something Seriously Wrong

Credit unions in New York State could be on the hook for billions of dollars in additional unauthorized transfer costs.

By Henry Meier, Esq. | April 08, 2024 at 12:43 PMPile of court files with a gavel sitting on top Credit/Shutterstock

There's been a lot of national news lately about pending court cases in New York City, but you may not have heard about the one that is important for credit unions on a national level.

In January, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit generally alleging that CitiBank was engaging in illegal and deceptive practices by refusing to extend protections of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA) to consumers victimized by unauthorized wire transfers. See People of the State of New York v. CitiBank, S.D.N.Y., Case No. 24 Civ. 0659).

Late last week, CitiBank filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. It makes a compelling argument that the AG's argument amounts to a radical reinterpretation of existing law that would expose financial institutions to billions of dollars in losses and make the existing framework for wire transfers obsolete overnight. Although this decision would only apply to the Second Circuit, you don't have to be Nostradamus to see that it would end up being litigated across the country.

In 1978, Congress passed the EFTA. Most importantly, the statute caps liability for unauthorized transfers involving a consumer account. However, even as it passed the law, Congress created a distinction between wire transfers, which are generally transfers using the Fed wire system and similar networks, and transactions covered by the EFTA. This distinction was absolutely critical since financial institutions did not want to be on the hook for the huge amount of money facilitated by the Fed on a daily basis. See 15 USC §1693a(7)(B).

Article 4A of the UCC, which was adopted in the 1990s, was drafted, in part, to further delineate the distinction between wire transfers and EFTA protections. Under Article 4A, financial institutions are not subject to strict liability for unauthorized fund transfers. They must, however, adopt procedures agreed to by customers designed to confirm that wire transfer requests are authorized. There is no strict liability for unauthorized transfers. Today, this distinction is so well established that virtually every account agreement contains separate sections for wire transfers and EFTA disclosures.

This background explains why the AG's argument is so important. The AG's argument is that financial institutions interpret the EFTA exemptions too broadly. The AG argues that while a wire transfer between banks using the Fed system is not subject to EFTA protections, the subsequent transfer of that money by the receiving bank into a consumer's account is covered.

For this and other reasons, I am cautiously optimistic that the AG's argument is a bridge too far and will be rejected. If it is not, credit unions in New York State will be on the hook for billions of dollars in additional unauthorized transfer costs and credit unions across the country will have to deal with similar lawsuits sprouting up in a courthouse near them sooner than later.

In fairness to the AG, however, the more I delve into issues relating to liability in EFT transfers, the more I have to concede that this is a statutory framework that is woefully antiquated. Wire transfers used to be primarily for facilitating fund transfers by large companies and wealthy individuals (remember George Wainwright used a wire transfer to quickly send money to the Bailey's Saving and Loan on that fateful Christmas Eve).

But times have changed. Today, many banks and credit unions provide consumers easy online access to wire transfers. While this is a boon for convenience, it is also a boon for hackers who can transfer a member's life savings out of their account within seconds.

The premise of existing law is that wire transfers would be used to transfer a large amount of money between sophisticated actors, while the EFTA would be used to protect consumer transactions. While the lawyer in me agrees with and supports this crystal clear distinction, the policy wonk in me thinks it is inevitable that as the distinction between wire transfers and EFTA transactions becomes harder and harder to recognize, you will see Congress, Legislatures and if need be, the courts bend over backwards to place more liability on financial institutions, not because they have done something wrong, but because they will feel that the consumer needs their protection.

Henry Meier Henry Meier, Esq.

Henry Meier is the former General Counsel of the New York Credit Union Association, where he authored the popular New York State of Mind blog. He now provides legal advice to credit unions on a broad range of legal, regulatory and legislative issues. He can be reached at (518) 223-5126 or via email at henrymeieresq@outlook.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Payments Lead the Way Globally: Key Insights from Worldpay Study

According to a recent Worldpay study, digital payments are rapidly becoming the preferred choice worldwide. The research highlights significant shifts in consumer behavior and payment preferences, driven by technological advancements and the growing acceptance of cashless transactions. Key findings from the study reveal that digital payments now account for a substantial portion of global transactions. Mobile wallets, contactless payments, and online banking are gaining traction, reflecting consumers' desire for convenience and speed. This trend is especially prominent in regions like Asia Pacific, where mobile payment adoption is leading the charge. The study also emphasizes the importance of security in fostering consumer trust in digital payments. As fraud concerns continue to rise, businesses must prioritize robust security measures to protect customer information and enhance the payment experience. Moreover, the transition to digital payments is not just about c...

Embracing ARMs And Battling Members’ Misconceptions

With adjustable-rate mortgages back in fashion, credit unions are educating members about the ins and outs of these products, dispelling misunderstandings along the way. With housing stock low, home prices high, and interest rates showing no signs of coming down, many credit unions are turning to adjustable-rate mortgages to help would-be borrowers find a home. ARM loans gained a bad reputation after the 2008 housing crisis and the Great Recession, but credit union leaders insist that with the right education and a clear understanding of how the product works, adjustable-rate mortgages can be an ideal solution for would-be homeowners. The Big Picture53% of those who don’t own a home believe homeownership is out of reach, according to a study from Northwestern Mutual . 58% of millennials feel this way, but roughly half of baby boomers and Gen X share the sentiment. According to Federal Reserve data, the average price of a home topped $510,000 at the end of 2024. That’s 32% higher than f...

Jim Nussle To Retire From America’s Credit Unions

  WASHINGTON—America’s Credit Unions President and CEO Jim Nussle plans to retire from the trade association, ACU announced. ACU said Nussle did not specify an exact date for his retirement but rather expressed his desire to provide the ACU board the “full flexibility” to conduct a search for a CEO over the next several months on a timeline of their choosing, and to ensure his ongoing efforts to champion the organization’s advocacy agenda.   Jim Nussle “Serving credit unions is a deep personal privilege. After a long career in advocacy from both sides of the policy making table, leading CUNA and the honor of helping to create and lead America’s Credit Unions, it is soon time for me to pursue new interests in retirement. My announcement today is intended to provide the board the time to conduct a thorough national search to find the next leader for the Association,” Nussle said.  “My full and ongoing focus will be on our intensive credit union advocacy efforts to prot...

Havoc.’ ‘Debacle.’ Analysts See Rough Road Ahead for Autos With Tariffs

WASHINGTON–What’s known: should President Trump’s tariffs remain in place, new and used vehicle prices are going to get even higher. The unknown: Will members stop buying cars, move from new to used, or given how many buy cars according to payment, move to less-expensive models? The tariffs also may create challenges for credit unions that serve some autoworkers. All of those questions and more remain much in flux with analysts predicting  auto prices could rise by $5,000 to $10,000 per vehicle and wreak havoc on the market as the result of 25% import tariffs on vehicles and auto parts.   As the CU Daily reports separately, however, Black Book believes automakers will spread out the incremental cost of tariffed vehicles across their entire showroom to retain relative vehicle transaction prices. Still, the company expects tariffs to push the average transaction price on vehicles to more than $50,000. ‘A Debacle’ “The tariffs are a debacle of epic proportions for the a...

Zelle Discontinues Standalone App, Shifts Users to Bank and Credit Union Platforms

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.—The standalone Zelle app is no longer available for sending or receiving money. Users are now encouraged to enroll through a participating bank or credit union’s app to continue using the peer-to-peer payment service, PYMNTS reported. Zelle had announced in an Oct. 31  blog post  that it would make this change, and it completed the move as of Tuesday (April 1), according to a frequently asked questions  page  on its website PYMNTS said/ “More than 2,200 banks and credit unions across the U.S. now offer Zelle through their mobile app or online banking site,” the company said on the FAQ page. “As a result of this growth, in October of 2024, we announced that we are removing the ability for users to send or receive money using the Zelle app starting April 1, 2025.” PYMNTS noted that the page advised users of the Zelle app to visit a “find your bank” page on its website to see if their bank or credit union offers Zelle; to...