Skip to main content

Impact of the RTP® network and the FedNow® service on card fees

In a recent webinar, Payments in 2024: What You Need to Know, featuring insights from Erika Baumann, Director of Commercial Banking & Payments Practice at Datos Insights, and Mark Majeske, Senior Vice President of Faster Payments at Alacriti. The discussion provided a comprehensive overview of the anticipated trends and innovations set to shape the payments sector in 2024. Read on to discover the answers to financial institution decision-makers’ questions during the webinar.

Impact of the RTP® network and the FedNow® service on card fees

What impact do we see on card fees, given the adoption of RTP and FedNow?

Baumann noted, “It’s too soon to see a significant impact on card fees due to RTP and FedNow. Financial institutions are concerned about the potential cannibalization of card, ACH, and wire volumes. However, the current volumes haven’t significantly affected these fees.” She emphasized the importance of viewing the total relationship value with businesses, including their card business, deposits, and transactions.

Mark Majeske added, “We haven’t observed any notable effects on card fees yet. As adoption and volume increase over the next few years, we may see some impact.”

Monetizing instant payments

How are financial institutions monetizing instant payments? What are you seeing as the different pricing models?

Majeske shared his perspective. “Monetization is crucial. Instant payments offer value due to their speed and 24/7 availability, justifying a fee. Some institutions charge for instant payments, recognizing it as a premium service. It’s important to charge market rates rather than compensating for lost revenue from other products.”

Baumann agreed but offered a word of caution: “While monetizing instant payments is important, it’s crucial to balance fees to maintain competitiveness and not deter usage. Financial institutions with strategic pricing and rollout plans see higher adoption rates.”

Baumann also shared what she’s been hearing from financial institutions. “I have some FIs that say I’m getting $15 per wire or $20 per wire; I need to make up for that and charge more for faster payments. When I ask businesses why they are not using real-time payments at their institution, I get a list of reasons, but one of them I’ve noticed at financial institutions that do not have as strategic of a rollout with their pricing and their total stickiness of how they’re going to maintain their portfolio and their market share.”

Choosing between FedNow and RTP

Which rail are people starting with first—FedNow or The Clearing House—and what are some considerations with that decision?

“Institutions are choosing both FedNow and RTP due to their similar features. Implementing both simultaneously is cost-effective and operationally efficient. It’s about addressing customer needs and solving problems effectively,” Majeske observed. “When you look at the integration effort, like if you are a customer of ours, if you’re going to bother to implement something, why not do both at the same time? The incremental cost of doing so is very, very small.”

Baumann elaborated, “The majority of the volume is still running through the RTP network, but institutions are adopting the FedNow Service as well. Each rail has its challenges, but offering both ensures comprehensive coverage.”

Request for payment and fraud solutions

How does Request for Payment work for Receive-only FIs?

“Request for Payment (RfP) is still developing. It requires Send capability, making it less suitable for Receive-only institutions at this stage,” Majeske remarked.

Baumann also weighed in. “You have to have the message types enabled so that the businesses can send that Request for Payment, get information back, and exchange those messages back and forth. I do agree that we’re not at an inflection point in the market yet, but there’s an opportunity there. I’m having a lot of FIs and the non-FIs talking to me about next-generation bill pay and what RfP means in optimizing this. So while we might not see the maturation for another 12 months or so, what we will see is financial institutions taking advantage of the earlier adopter advantage.”

The topic of fraud prevention in real-time payments also came up. “We are developing real-time fraud solutions, recognizing the importance of integrated fraud prevention in instant payments,” said Majeske.

Addressing ACH cannibalism

What amount of cannibalism are you seeing from ACH?

Baumann reframed the issue. “Rather than cannibalism, we see strategic shifts in payment volumes. ACH growth is slowing but not declining. New economy markets favor more efficient payment methods like RTP and FedNow. If an FI is seeing some of their volume shift, that means that your clients are optimizing their end-to-end payment strategy. And that’s actually a good thing. We have not seen a decrease in ACH volumes, but we have seen a slowing growth trajectory when we go out to businesses and say, what have you used? Then I ask them, what is your projected growth rate for each one of these methods that you’ve used in the last 12 months and the continuing 12 months? ACH is much lower. It’s actually the lowest on the growth curve of the anticipated aggressive growth.”

Majeske added, “It’s a natural shift based on customer need. Instant payments provide 24/7 capability, which ACH and wire transfers can’t offer.”

Instant payments for B2B and B2C

What is the breakdown for instant payments of B2B versus B2C? For B2B, what type of relationship or contract is expected before moving a vendor to instant payments?

“The use cases, just like any other technology we see, really start in the consumer realm and leak up to the business side. So, the expectations for faster payments in the business world started on the P2P side. It started with the Venmos and the Cash Apps answered then by Zelle from the financial institutions, which then obviously Zelle small business, which used to not be actually real-time. Now it is, but it was a handshake between banks. It’s the financial institution’s way of inserting themselves in combating some of the lost deposits into those digital wallets. It then moves upstream, so it’s less about the percentage and more about how is that mentality and that shift changing. If you have payment terms with, or if a business has payment terms with, an established business partner, they probably (unless those terms need to be revised) don’t need to re-look at that.

Where it becomes important is I’m working on efficiencies, I’m working on strengthening my relationships, and I wanna make the most of my liquidity. So I don’t want to pay two days from now and see when that clears or pay yesterday. I want to pay at the exact moment that this other important impending payment has come in. So the B2B marketplace is taking lessons from the B2C and the P2P marketplace and utilizing faster payments as it makes sense to have more efficient data, better market relationships, not necessarily to displace processes that are already working really well,” explained Baumann.

Healthcare industry adoption of payment technology

Do you view the healthcare industry as a slow adopter of payment technology?

“Healthcare payments tend to lag, presenting significant market opportunities. Engaging with healthcare companies early can lead to strategic advantages,” noted Baumann.

Mark Majeske agreed, adding, “Healthcare is growing rapidly in other technologies, and we expect payments to become more integrated into their daily operations, presenting substantial opportunities.”

 

For more insights on payments trends in 2024, watch the full webinar, Payments in 2024: What You Need to Know, featuring Alacriti and Datos Insights.

Alacriti’s centralized payment platform, Orbipay Payments Hub, provides innovation opportunities and the ability to make smart routing decisions at the credit union to meet their individual needs. Credit unions can take full ownership of their payments and control their evolution with ACH, Wire, TCH’s RTP® network, Visa Direct, and the FedNow® Service, all on one cloud-based platform. To speak with an Alacriti payments expert, please contact us at (908) 791-2916 or info@alacriti.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unlocking the Future: How Generative AI is Transforming Credit Unions

  Unlocking the Future: How Generative AI is Transforming Credit Unions In the rapidly evolving financial landscape, technology plays an increasingly pivotal role. Among the most exciting advancements is Generative AI, which is poised to transform how credit unions operate and serve their members. Read on to discover how generative AI can reshape the member experience and optimize operations within credit unions. What is Generative AI? Generative AI refers to a class of artificial intelligence that can create new content—such as text, images, and audio—based on existing data. Unlike traditional AI, which focuses on analyzing and recognizing patterns, generative AI synthesizes new information, offering exciting possibilities for financial institutions, particularly credit unions. The Applications of Generative AI in Credit Unions Personalized Financial Advice Credit unions pride themselves on their member relationships, and generative AI can enhance these connections....

Live Podcast with Bonnie Sensing, Executive VP of Nashville Firemen's Credit Union on BSA

Jo in us in this live episode as Grant Sheehan, CCUE | CEO of the National Council of Firefighter Credit Unions (NCOFCU), interviews Bonnie Sensing, Executive VP of Nashville Firemen's Credit Union. We break down the BSA complex regulations, explore BSA compliance strategies, and discuss real-world implications for directors and staff. BSA Podcast YouTube NCOFCU Podcasts  

Before You Push Send!

  The Art of Thoughtful Discourse in a Noisy World In an era where opinions flood every corner of social media, news platforms, and casual conversations, the sheer volume of voices can be both inspiring and overwhelming. Everyone seems to have something to say, and while it's a beautiful thing to witness such diverse perspectives, it raises an important question: how can we ensure that our contributions are meaningful and resonate with others? The Power of Evidence-Based Opinions At the heart of impactful communication lies the value of substantiation. Personal views are indeed intriguing and can spark engaging discussions. However, without solid evidence or context to support them, these opinions can quickly lose their potency. When we articulate our thoughts without backing them up, we risk contributing to the noise rather than enhancing the dialogue. To make meaningful contributions, it’s essential to prioritize reasoning over reflexivity. Taking the time to gathe...

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 You Need to Prepare Now to Compete for New Fed Gov’t Funded Savings Accounts for Children

WASHINGTON–Credit unions, which often talk about the need for younger members, will now have the opportunity to compete in a new arena for the youngest members of all, as the recently passed reconciliation bill includes language creating and funding for a new savings account for children, with a one-time deposit of $1,000 from the federal government for those born in 2025 through 2028. The new accounts are expected to create a new battleground of competition for credit unions as every provider from banks to fintechs to others seeks to capture the accounts.  The final version of the bill makes the tax-free savings accounts for minors, called Trump accounts, a form of individual retirement account (IRA) under Sec. 408(a), according to the Journal of Accountancy. Under the legislation, the accounts will be IRAs (but not Roth IRAs) for the exclusive benefit of individuals under 18.  About the Contributions “Contributions can only be made in calendar years before the beneficia...

NCUA Issues Notice of Voluntary EGRPRA Review

  NCUA Issues Notice of Voluntary EGRPRA Review ALEXANDRIA, VA (July 10, 2025)  – The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) today announced the next step in its plans to voluntarily review agency regulations to identify rules that are outdated, unnecessary, and unduly burdensome to federally insured credit unions. This effort aligns with the federal government’s commitment to efficiency and the NCUA’s continued efforts to reduce regulatory burden on credit unions. The review, which will be conducted over the course of approximately two years, is part of the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA) of 1996. While the NCUA is not statutorily required to undertake the review, NCUA has elected to participate in the decennial review process. The NCUA divided its regulations into 10 categories and plans to publish four  Federal Register  documents in total, each requesting comment on multiple categories. The comment period for each notice will ...