Skip to main content

The Pros and Cons of Tariffs

Since there has been so much discussion on Tariffs, I felt a post would benefit our membership.
Grant Sheehan CEO NCOFCU

Tariffs

Background

A tariff—a word derived from the Arabic arafa, meaning “to make known”—is a tax imposed by a government on goods that are imported or exported. Historically, tariffs have served as a primary source of revenue and a means to protect domestic industries, as they make foreign products more expensive, encouraging consumers to purchase locally produced goods.

The tools have a checkered history, famously bolstering US textiles, German steel, Japanese cars, South Korean technology, and more, arguably contributing to major economic downturns like the Great Depression. Tariffs can be specific (a fixed fee per unit) or ad valorem (a percentage of the item's value).

Purpose

Economically, tariffs aim to protect domestic industries, generate government revenue, and influence trade policy.

By imposing taxes on imported goods—which raise the price of goods produced abroad—tariffs can shield local industries from foreign competition. In theory, this can allow early-stage domestic industries to grow and eventually compete globally.

Before the establishment of income taxes, tariffs were a primary source of income for governments. For example, tariffs accounted for a significant portion of US federal government revenue during the 19th century. Tariffs can also be used as leverage in trade negotiations, encouraging other nations to modify their trade practices.

Tariffs Throughout History

In ancient Rome and Greece, taxes were levied on imported goods, such as grain and textiles, to control trade.

Economic theory began to shift toward supporting free trade in the late 18th century, thanks to frameworks established by British economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo. Smith and Ricardo argued tariffs and protectionism stunted economic growth, suggesting countries should focus on producing and exporting goods they can produce more cheaply, while importing goods that other nations produce more efficiently.

The United States has utilized tariffs throughout its history to protect its domestic industries and promote industrialization (one of the first acts signed into law by Congress established tariffs).

During the Great Depression, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 was passed to revive domestic industry, raising taxes on roughly 25% of all imported goods. However, most historians and economists agree that the resulting trade war exacerbated the global economic crisis.

Tariffs in Modern Times

Following World War II, America facilitated the rebuilding of the global economy and prioritized removing barriers between nations to trade goods, a process called trade liberalization. This resulted in the establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in 1947.

The GATT and its successor, the World Trade Organization, established structured frameworks for trade negotiation and dispute resolution between countries. The creation of these institutions resulted in significant increases in global trade and declines in the use of tariffs and trade restrictions.

In recent years, tariffs have reemerged as a significant tool of international trade policy. During President Donald Trump’s first administration, the United States imposed substantial tariffs, most notably on imports from China. This resulted in retaliatory measures by China, escalating into a trade war between the two nations that also prompted urgency for industry diversification and increased protection of US intellectual property.

Debates and Controversies

The use of tariffs is a contentious issue. Many economists argue that tariffs distort the efficiency of markets, leading to higher prices for consumers. Studies have shown that tariffs can result in declines in domestic output and productivity, as well as higher unemployment and inequality.

Despite the economic criticisms, tariffs often hold political appeal as they are perceived to protect local jobs and industries and assert national goals. This can lead to bipartisan support for tariff measures, even when evidence suggests they may harm the broader economy.

To watch a video gallery on Tariffs Click Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Skills Board Chairs Need Now: Leading Through Complexity, Not Control

NCOFCU Podcast   Grant Sheehan CCUE | CCUP | CEO-NCOFCU The role of the board chair has quietly—but fundamentally—changed. A decade ago, success was defined by experience, authority, and strategic judgment. Today, those traits are still relevant—but no longer sufficient. The modern board chair operates in a world shaped by competing stakeholder demands, technological disruption, geopolitical uncertainty, and increasing scrutiny. What emerges is a role that is less about control—and more about navigating complexity. Below are the core capabilities that now define effective board leadership. 1. From Authority to Orchestration The most important shift is conceptual. Board chairs are no longer expected to be the smartest voice in the room. Instead, they are expected to make the room smarter . This requires the ability to: Synthesize large volumes of information Reconcile conflicting perspectives Facilitate high-quality dialogue Traditional strengths like executive experience matter les...

On Stablecoins, NCUA Has Opportunity to Strike Right Balance and Get it Right

By Grant Sheehan As digital payments continue to evolve, the National Credit Union Administration’s (NCUA) efforts to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins mark an important step forward. For credit unions, especially those serving mission-driven communities like firefighters and first responders, access to emerging financial technologies is not just an opportunity but a necessity to remain competitive and relevant. The  National Council of Firefighter Credit Unions  (NCOFCU) appreciates the  thoughtful input  provided by both America’s Credit Unions and the Defense Credit Union Council (DCUC) on the NCUA’s proposed stablecoin framework. We find strong merit in the recommendations of both organizations and believe their combined perspectives offer a constructive roadmap for getting this right. Important First Phase, But… At its core, the proposal represents an important first phase in implementing the stablecoin provisions of the GENIUS Act. Establishing a...

It All Starts in the Boardroom

It all starts in the boardroom—but the consequences are felt far beyond it. When Governance Breaks Down, Members Pay the Price Credit unions are built on a simple but powerful idea: they are owned by their members. Unlike traditional banks, where shareholders drive decisions, credit unions are meant to operate democratically—guided by a volunteer board elected by the very people they serve. But that model only works when participation exists. A governance breakdown happens when the people elected to oversee an institution stop truly representing the people who own it. In credit unions, this breakdown doesn’t usually come from scandal or sudden failure. It happens quietly, over time—through disengagement. The Root of the Problem: Low Engagement Most credit union members don’t vote. Board election turnout is typically in the low single digits. In some cases, it’s barely measurable. That means a very small percentage of the membership is effectively deciding who governs an institution th...

Growing Your Credit Union Without Expanding Your FOM

For many firefighter and other credit union primarly serving first responders, growth often feels tied to one big decision: expanding the Field of Membership (FOM). But what if you didn’t have to? What if growth could come from within —by deepening relationships, increasing engagement, and capturing more of the financial lives of the members you already serve? The truth is: it can. But it requires a shift in strategy. Rethinking What “Growth” Really Means Most institutions define growth as adding more members. But for single-sponsor credit unions, especially those serving first responders, a more powerful definition is: Growth = more value per member Many members only use one or two products—often a checking account and maybe an auto loan. Meanwhile, larger banks capture mortgages, credit cards, and investments. The opportunity isn’t just new members. It’s: More products per member Higher balances per relationship Greater share of wallet Your Biggest Advantage: The First Responder Life...

Sunday Reading - Why the IRS is necessary

  'Taxman'   Why the IRS is necessary The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, is a division of the US Treasury Department created in 1862   that enforces the Internal Revenue Code —Title 26 of the US Code, a compilation of federal statutes—and, effectively, oversees tax collection. In 2024, the IRS's roughly 75,000 employees collected roughly $5T in tax revenue.   Given its role in diverting household income streams, it also has a bad reputation. Half of Americans had an "unfavorable view" of the IRS as of 2024 ( see data ). In a ranking of 16 well-known federal agencies by popularity that year, t...

It's Financial Literacy Month

April is Financial Literacy Month—a time dedicated to empowering individuals and families with the knowledge and tools needed to make informed financial decisions. Whether you're budgeting, saving, managing debt, or planning for the future, improving your financial literacy can have a lasting impact on your well-being. We invite you to explore our Consumer Education website, where you'll find helpful resources, tips, and guidance to support your financial journey. If you find it valuable, please share it with your family and friends—because financial knowledge is even more powerful when it’s shared. https://www.ncofcu.org/financial-literacy  ================================================= Remember, you're not alone with  NCOFCU.org Join/Upgrade Check out some of NCOFCU's additional features: Annual Conference First Responder Credit Union Academy Financial Literacy Podcasts YouTube Mini's Advocacy  

Growing Use of Stablecoins Could Reshape How FIs Manage Liquidity, Allocate Assets, NY Fed Report Suggests

NEW YORK — The growing use of stablecoins tied to the U.S. dollar could reshape how banks manage liquidity and allocate assets, potentially leading institutions that support the digital tokens to hold more reserves and make fewer loans, according to a new study from the  Federal Reserve Bank of New York . The paper, titled “ Stablecoin Disintermediation ,” was authored by economists Michael Junho Lee and Donny Tou and examines how stablecoin activity affects the balance sheets and liquidity management of banks that partner with stablecoin issuers. The researchers found that while stablecoins rely on traditional banks to function, the relationships can alter the liquidity demands placed on those institutions. Banks serving stablecoin issuers tend to hold larger reserve balances and reduce the share of assets devoted to lending, shifting toward a more reserve-heavy banking model. Focus of Study The study focused on developments following the March 2023 collapse of...

Join NCOFCU partner Vining Sparks this Thursday for their economic outlook webinar

If you are a portfolio manager, CFO, or CEO/president be sure to join NCOFCU partner Vining Sparks this Thursday, July 16, at 11 a.m. ET for its third quarter economic outlook webinar. Vining Sparks' Chief Economist Craig Dismuke will evaluate economic developments and fixed income sector performance to identify risks and opportunities within the U.S. market. To attend this free webinar register today! You will receive instructions to access the webinar after your registration is confirmed. If you do not receive a registration confirmation email, please contact Vining Sparks via email . This educational event is offered to institutional investors only. Vining Sparks is a member of FINRA/SIPC.

Newly Released Fed Minutes Show Policymakers Seeking to be Flexible on Rates

04/13/2023  Tweet WASHINGTON — Newly released minutes from the Federal Reserve’s March meeting show officials are seeking to remain flexible when it comes to future rate decisions. The paradox for the Fed remains that the labor market remains strong, even as inflation continues to be high, although it cooled in March, according to new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Central bankers have spent more than a year waging a battle against the most painful burst of price increases in decades, raising interest rates to slow the economy and to wrestle price increases under control,” noted the Wall Street...

Facial recognition to secure payments will exceed 1.4 billion globally by 2025

BASINGSTOKE, U.K.– The number of users of software-based facial recognition to secure payments will exceed 1.4 billion globally by 2025, from just 671 million in 2020, according to a new study from Juniper Research. “This rapid growth of 120% demonstrates how widespread facial recognition has become; fueled by its low barriers to entry, a front-facing camera and appropriate software,” Juniper said, noting the research identified the implementation of FaceID by Apple as accelerating the growth of the wider facial recognition market, despite the challenges to facial recognition during the pandemic with face mask use. The research recommends that facial recognition vendors implement robust and rapidly evolving AI based verification checks to ensure the validity of user identity, or risk losing user trust in the authentication method as spoofing attempts increase, Juniper reported. Fingerprint Sensors The new research, Mobile Payment Authentication: Biometrics, Regulation & Market Fore...