Skip to main content

The Pros and Cons of Tariffs

Since there has been so much discussion on Tariffs, I felt a post would benefit our membership.
Grant Sheehan CEO NCOFCU

Tariffs

Background

A tariff—a word derived from the Arabic arafa, meaning “to make known”—is a tax imposed by a government on goods that are imported or exported. Historically, tariffs have served as a primary source of revenue and a means to protect domestic industries, as they make foreign products more expensive, encouraging consumers to purchase locally produced goods.

The tools have a checkered history, famously bolstering US textiles, German steel, Japanese cars, South Korean technology, and more, arguably contributing to major economic downturns like the Great Depression. Tariffs can be specific (a fixed fee per unit) or ad valorem (a percentage of the item's value).

Purpose

Economically, tariffs aim to protect domestic industries, generate government revenue, and influence trade policy.

By imposing taxes on imported goods—which raise the price of goods produced abroad—tariffs can shield local industries from foreign competition. In theory, this can allow early-stage domestic industries to grow and eventually compete globally.

Before the establishment of income taxes, tariffs were a primary source of income for governments. For example, tariffs accounted for a significant portion of US federal government revenue during the 19th century. Tariffs can also be used as leverage in trade negotiations, encouraging other nations to modify their trade practices.

Tariffs Throughout History

In ancient Rome and Greece, taxes were levied on imported goods, such as grain and textiles, to control trade.

Economic theory began to shift toward supporting free trade in the late 18th century, thanks to frameworks established by British economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo. Smith and Ricardo argued tariffs and protectionism stunted economic growth, suggesting countries should focus on producing and exporting goods they can produce more cheaply, while importing goods that other nations produce more efficiently.

The United States has utilized tariffs throughout its history to protect its domestic industries and promote industrialization (one of the first acts signed into law by Congress established tariffs).

During the Great Depression, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 was passed to revive domestic industry, raising taxes on roughly 25% of all imported goods. However, most historians and economists agree that the resulting trade war exacerbated the global economic crisis.

Tariffs in Modern Times

Following World War II, America facilitated the rebuilding of the global economy and prioritized removing barriers between nations to trade goods, a process called trade liberalization. This resulted in the establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in 1947.

The GATT and its successor, the World Trade Organization, established structured frameworks for trade negotiation and dispute resolution between countries. The creation of these institutions resulted in significant increases in global trade and declines in the use of tariffs and trade restrictions.

In recent years, tariffs have reemerged as a significant tool of international trade policy. During President Donald Trump’s first administration, the United States imposed substantial tariffs, most notably on imports from China. This resulted in retaliatory measures by China, escalating into a trade war between the two nations that also prompted urgency for industry diversification and increased protection of US intellectual property.

Debates and Controversies

The use of tariffs is a contentious issue. Many economists argue that tariffs distort the efficiency of markets, leading to higher prices for consumers. Studies have shown that tariffs can result in declines in domestic output and productivity, as well as higher unemployment and inequality.

Despite the economic criticisms, tariffs often hold political appeal as they are perceived to protect local jobs and industries and assert national goals. This can lead to bipartisan support for tariff measures, even when evidence suggests they may harm the broader economy.

To watch a video gallery on Tariffs Click Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unlocking the Future: How Generative AI is Transforming Credit Unions

  Unlocking the Future: How Generative AI is Transforming Credit Unions In the rapidly evolving financial landscape, technology plays an increasingly pivotal role. Among the most exciting advancements is Generative AI, which is poised to transform how credit unions operate and serve their members. Read on to discover how generative AI can reshape the member experience and optimize operations within credit unions. What is Generative AI? Generative AI refers to a class of artificial intelligence that can create new content—such as text, images, and audio—based on existing data. Unlike traditional AI, which focuses on analyzing and recognizing patterns, generative AI synthesizes new information, offering exciting possibilities for financial institutions, particularly credit unions. The Applications of Generative AI in Credit Unions Personalized Financial Advice Credit unions pride themselves on their member relationships, and generative AI can enhance these connections....

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 You Need to Prepare Now to Compete for New Fed Gov’t Funded Savings Accounts for Children

WASHINGTON–Credit unions, which often talk about the need for younger members, will now have the opportunity to compete in a new arena for the youngest members of all, as the recently passed reconciliation bill includes language creating and funding for a new savings account for children, with a one-time deposit of $1,000 from the federal government for those born in 2025 through 2028. The new accounts are expected to create a new battleground of competition for credit unions as every provider from banks to fintechs to others seeks to capture the accounts.  The final version of the bill makes the tax-free savings accounts for minors, called Trump accounts, a form of individual retirement account (IRA) under Sec. 408(a), according to the Journal of Accountancy. Under the legislation, the accounts will be IRAs (but not Roth IRAs) for the exclusive benefit of individuals under 18.  About the Contributions “Contributions can only be made in calendar years before the beneficia...

Live Podcast with Bonnie Sensing, Executive VP of Nashville Firemen's Credit Union on BSA

Jo in us in this live episode as Grant Sheehan, CCUE | CEO of the National Council of Firefighter Credit Unions (NCOFCU), interviews Bonnie Sensing, Executive VP of Nashville Firemen's Credit Union. We break down the BSA complex regulations, explore BSA compliance strategies, and discuss real-world implications for directors and staff. BSA Podcast YouTube NCOFCU Podcasts  

Before You Push Send!

  The Art of Thoughtful Discourse in a Noisy World In an era where opinions flood every corner of social media, news platforms, and casual conversations, the sheer volume of voices can be both inspiring and overwhelming. Everyone seems to have something to say, and while it's a beautiful thing to witness such diverse perspectives, it raises an important question: how can we ensure that our contributions are meaningful and resonate with others? The Power of Evidence-Based Opinions At the heart of impactful communication lies the value of substantiation. Personal views are indeed intriguing and can spark engaging discussions. However, without solid evidence or context to support them, these opinions can quickly lose their potency. When we articulate our thoughts without backing them up, we risk contributing to the noise rather than enhancing the dialogue. To make meaningful contributions, it’s essential to prioritize reasoning over reflexivity. Taking the time to gathe...

The Case for Advisory Committees in Credit Unions

  Grant Sheehan, CEO, NCOFCU The Case for Advisory Committees in Credit Unions: Ensuring Vibrant Leadership and Member Engagement In the world of credit unions, the leadership structures often reflect a unique balance of tradition and innovation. For many credit union boards of directors, tenure can stretch over decades, creating a wealth of experience and stability. However, when these long-serving members retire from the host company, a common phenomenon arises: a reluctance to leave their positions. While their dedication is commendable, this situation can pose challenges to the credit union’s ability to adapt to the evolving needs of its membership. As directors transition into retirement, they may find that their connection to the credit union and its members has diminished. Having spent years in leadership, their focus can inadvertently shift to legacy management—relying heavily on what has historically worked rather than embracing new strategies. This is where t...